Winter Olympics Bidding
Practice this advanced growth strategy case interview question in the Entertainment & Media sector. Includes detailed problem prompt, clarifying questions, structured framework, and expert recommendation. Part of ProHub's 835+ consulting case library.
This case tests quantitative rigor combined with strategic judgment. Candidates must calculate NPV precisely ($200M) but then determine whether intangible factors (viewer acquisition, brand prestige, cross-promotion opportunities) justify adjusting the bid upward or downward. The case rewards structured thinking, financial accuracy, and ultimately the ability to defend deviations from the NPV using game theory and competitive bidding dynamics.
Clarifying Information
Revenues:
- No subscription revenue, but can keep 100% of advertising revenue
- Ad rates are $400k per 30 second ad for prime time (weekends, weekdays 1900 - 2300) and $200k non-prime time
- Market research has shown that you can include no more than 10 minutes of advertising per hour
Costs:
- $482m of total production costs
- Opportunity cost: $1m/hour
- Time value of money: 4 year lag for receipt of revenue
Practice More Case Interview Questions
Browse 835+ real consulting case interview examples from top firms. Filter by difficulty, company, industry, or case type. Or try our AI mock interview for instant feedback and scoring.