Vitriolic Wealth Advisors faces a crisis after its CFO’s fraud causes loss of 60% of clientele. The candidate must guide the company through restructuring, analyzing whether cost reduction, acquisition, or bankruptcy is preferable. Pre-scandal profitability was $4.14T, but after losing 60% revenue to $3.4B, the company becomes unprofitable even with aggressive cost cuts, necessitating strategic alternatives.
Key Insights:
- Cost reduction alone cannot restore profitability when core revenue base is decimated—candidate must recognize this limitation and escalate to strategic options
- The case teaches workforce planning math: (12M accounts × 3 employees per account) / 15 accounts per employee = 2.4M employees, with proportional layoffs required
- Non-financial factors (brand reputation, customer perception, leadership continuity) are equally critical to financial metrics when evaluating turnaround strategies
- Acquisition presents a trade-off: only 10% workforce reduction vs. loss of client autonomy and CEO removal—excellent candidates discuss this tension explicitly
- The case demonstrates that crisis situations often require ’least bad’ choice rather than optimal solution—framing the recommendation around customer perception and realistic recovery timelines