Vibrants

ProHub Comment

This is a straightforward product launch profitability case where the interviewer-led format allows candidates to discover that margin analysis alone is insufficient—customer preference data is critical. The key insight hinges on recognizing that under-30 customers (the target demographic) overwhelmingly prefer the Vibrants brand (87.5% vs. 12.5% for in-house), which outweighs the superior margins of the in-house alternative and aligns with the 90-day launch constraint.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Easy
Source NYU
50 / 100

Your client, a national drug-store, is adding a new type of hair dye to its retail offering. “Highlights Dye” allows customers to comb in small amounts of various color to hair rather than the traditional method of dying the whole head. The client is considering launching it’s own in-house brand or carrying an existing recognized brand-name – “Vibrants”.

Should the drugstore carry Vibrants over the in-store brand?

Clarifying Information

  1. The retail chain already carries their in-house brand in many products (toothpaste, cotton swabs, etc) which includes traditional hair dye in both temporary and permanent varieties
  2. “Highlights Dye” is a type of fashion-forward product available in natural and florescent colors. Each application lasts roughly 30 days
  3. The target customer is under 30 years in age
  4. The business objective is profitability
  5. The timeline is 90-days to launch