Vibrants

ProHub Comment

This is a straightforward product launch case that tests basic financial analysis and market research interpretation. The key insight is recognizing that despite superior profit margins on the in-house brand, the target customer demographic (under 30) overwhelmingly prefers the Vibrants brand, combined with the tight 90-day timeline making new product development risky. Strong candidates will balance the financial attractiveness of higher margins against customer preference and execution risk.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Easy
Source NYU
50 / 100

Your client, a national drug-store, is adding a new type of hair dye to its retail offering. “Highlights Dye” allows customers to comb in small amounts of various color to hair rather than the traditional method of dying the whole head. The client is considering launching it’s own in-house brand or carrying an existing recognized brand-name – “Vibrants”.

Should the drugstore carry Vibrants over the in-store brand?

Clarifying Information

  1. The retail chain already carries their in-house brand in many products (toothpaste, cotton swabs, etc) which includes traditional hair dye in both temporary and permanent varieties
  2. “Highlights Dye” is a type of fashion-forward product available in natural and florescent colors. Each application lasts roughly 30 days
  3. The target customer is under 30 years in age
  4. The business objective is profitability
  5. The timeline is 90-days to launch