Medium Profitability Competitive Response Market Diagnosis

The Video Store

ProHub Comment

This is a diagnostic case requiring structured problem decomposition. The case teaches proper hypothesis development by first diagnosing symptoms (falling profits), then isolating root causes (traffic vs. share of wallet), then identifying competitive threats. The key insight is redefining the competitive set from 'video stores' to 'home movie entertainment,' revealing that digital distribution technologies (PPV, cable, Movie on Demand) are the true competitors—not direct retail competition.

Estimated Time 26 minutes
Difficulty Medium
Source Harvard
10 / 100

Two business school classmates laud their entrepreneurship intentions and mock your interest in entering the management consulting industry. They decide that despite trends that indicate otherwise, what is needed is a video rental store closer to the HBS campus. They try to convince you to join, but in your infinite wisdom you instead join a prominent strategy consulting firm in Boston.

Their first two years meet unprecedented success. They buy matching Porches and a townhouse in Beacon Hill. Needless to say, each time you meet up for social occasions, they share with you (mostly with tongue in cheek) their success and a “I told you so” attitude. You handle their jabs well, as you feel you have had a terrific experience at your consulting firm.

The story, however, changes in about 12 months. Despite two and a half years of dramatic profit and revenue growth, profits have dramatically fallen. They call you (with a fair amount of egg on their face) and say “we don’t know what happened and our mortgage and car payments are getting tougher to meet. Can you help us? We know that you help CEO’s of large companies get to the bottom of their issues.” With more than a little satisfaction and justice in your voice you agree to help.

What do you think the problem is?

Clarifying Information

Not provided in the case structure - this case uses a ‘Suggested Questions’ format rather than traditional clarifying information sections
Mock Interview
Interviewer

Two business school classmates laud their entrepreneurship intentions and mock your interest in entering the management consulting industry. They decide that despite trends that indicate otherwise, what is needed is a video rental store closer to the HBS campus. They try to convince you to join, but in your infinite wisdom you instead join a prominent strategy consulting firm in Boston. Their first two years meet unprecedented success. They buy matching Porches and a townhouse in Beacon Hill. Needless to say, each time you meet up for social occasions, they share with you (mostly with tongue in cheek) their success and a "I told you so" attitude. You handle their jabs well, as you feel you have had a terrific experience at your consulting firm. The story, however, changes in about 12 months. Despite two and a half years of dramatic profit and revenue growth, profits have dramatically fallen. They call you (with a fair amount of egg on their face) and say "we don't know what happened and our mortgage and car payments are getting tougher to meet. Can you help us? We know that you help CEO's of large companies get to the bottom of their issues." With more than a little satisfaction and justice in your voice you agree to help. What do you think the problem is?

You

Thanks. Before analyzing, I'd like to clarify a few key questions...

Interviewer

Good question. Let me provide some background information...

You

Based on this, I suggest analyzing from these dimensions...

AI Score
Structure Analysis Communication Business Sense Quantitative
Practicing...
Score coming soon
Practice this case with AI Mock Interview

A video rental store near HBS experiences dramatic profit decline after 2.5 years of growth. Through structured analysis, the consultant discovers store traffic has fallen (not customer spending), and the true competitive threat is not new video stores or movie theatres, but emerging home entertainment alternatives like cable PPV and Movie on Demand services.

Key Insights:

  1. Proper diagnosis requires separating symptoms from root causes using data (traffic vs. share of wallet metrics)
  2. Competitive set definition is critical—this business competes in ‘home movie entertainment,’ not just ‘video rental retail’
  3. High fixed-cost businesses are vulnerable to revenue declines; cost was unlikely the problem given pricing remained unchanged
  4. Macro factors were ruled out, making competitive/market disruption the primary hypothesis
  5. Digital disruption and changing consumer preferences (delivery, PPV, on-demand) were reducing the overall market size for physical video rental stores