Rubicon Co acquired Scarlet Air but post-acquisition profits underperformed expectations. The candidate must identify why profitability lagged despite revenue synergies, discover that Marketing and IT costs weren’t consolidated (unlike HR and Property), calculate potential cost savings, and analyze route-level profitability in the Pacific Northwest to find the remaining path to the $100M profit improvement target.
Key Insights:
- Synergies aren’t automatic post-acquisition: HR and Property achieved 25% savings, but Marketing and IT did not, representing a key optimization opportunity
- Route-level analysis is critical: Exhibit 2 reveals that two of three routes in Pacific NW are unprofitable on a per-seat basis, but cutting them entirely has qualitative costs (connecting passengers, political relationships, contractual obligations)
- The case requires both quantitative rigor (calculating annual profit/loss per route: Seattle-Denver = $45.5M profit, Portland-Seattle = $2M loss, Denver-Portland = $10.5M loss) and strategic thinking about implementation risks (morale, demand changes)
- The $100M target can be achieved through two levers: ~$59M from Marketing & IT cost reductions (25% savings on combined budgets) plus ~$62M from route cost optimization (matching competitors’ cost structures), totaling ~$121M improvement