Retirement Apartment Complexes

ProHub Comment

This case tests profitability analysis and market entry strategy through a comparative regional analysis. The candidate must build a structured financial model comparing North vs. South operations while considering both short-term (90% occupancy) and long-term (80% occupancy) scenarios. Critical insight: despite lower per-unit revenue in absolute dollars, the North's higher rent and medical facility premium yield comparable profit margins to the South long-term, making expansion attractive despite higher costs and market uncertainty.

Estimated Time 27 minutes
Difficulty Medium
Source Chicago Booth
10 / 100

Our client owns and operates 25 retirement apartment complexes for the 55-75 year old demographic. The apartment complexes are in the Southeast and Southwest states of Florida, California, New Mexico and Arizona. The main goal for the client is to maximize profitability, so the client company’s CEO is considering expanding into Northern states. As a pilot, the client built an apartment complex in downtown Chicago two years ago. By and large, the client’s apartment complexes have similar designs and amenities. However, the new complex in Chicago has more amenities than the client’s properties in the South.

What are the main factors the CEO should consider for growth in the US?

Clarifying Information

Demand in the North: A survey of pre-retirees and retirees across a number of states, including New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Illinois, revealed an unmet demand in the North for retirement facilities. Retirees wanted options that would allow them to stay close to their families and friends.

Competition: In the South competition is fierce. In the North, competition is fragmented or nonexistent.

Revenues: • In the South, rent includes maintenance, amenities, and utilities. • In the North, rent further includes charges for access to a 24-hour on-site medical facility. • For the purposes of this analysis, buildings within a region can be considered identical.

Amenity Differences: The pilot building in the North offers 24-hour access to a medical facility in the complex.

Occupancy rates: Occupancy rates for new complexes typically start around 90%. Over time, they have tended to settle out around 80%. The pilot building in Chicago is still seeing a 90% occupancy rate.

Per Building, Per Month data: South: Units/Building 800, Rent revenue/Unit $500, Maintenance costs/Unit $125, Amenities $48,000, Utilities $38,000, SG&A $80,000, Medical Facility $0

North: Units/Building 400, Rent revenue/Unit $1000, Maintenance costs/Unit $200, Amenities $56,000, Utilities $45,000, SG&A $64,000, Medical Facility $55,000

Mock Interview
Interviewer

Our client owns and operates 25 retirement apartment complexes for the 55-75 year old demographic. The apartment complexes are in the Southeast and Southwest states of Florida, California, New Mexico and Arizona. The main goal for the client is to maximize profitability, so the client company's CEO is considering expanding into Northern states. As a pilot, the client built an apartment complex in downtown Chicago two years ago. By and large, the client's apartment complexes have similar designs and amenities. However, the new complex in Chicago has more amenities than the client's properties in the South. What are the main factors the CEO should consider for growth in the US?

You

Thanks. Before analyzing, I'd like to clarify a few key questions...

Interviewer

Good question. Let me provide some background information...

You

Based on this, I suggest analyzing from these dimensions...

AI Score
Structure Analysis Communication Business Sense Quantitative
Practicing...
Score coming soon
Practice this case with AI Mock Interview

A retirement apartment REIT is considering Northern US expansion based on a successful Chicago pilot. The case requires analyzing profitability differences between the established Southern market (lower rent, fierce competition, 80% occupancy) and the emerging Northern market (higher rent, medical amenities, low competition, 90% current occupancy). The recommendation favors Northern expansion to capture first-mover advantage while piloting medical facility upgrades in the South.

Key Insights:

  1. Profit margins converge between regions (~16.8%) at comparable occupancy rates, making diversification strategically sound despite operational complexity
  2. Revenue per unit is 2x higher in North ($1,000 vs $500) but is offset by doubled costs, requiring careful unit economics analysis
  3. Occupancy rate is the critical sensitivity variable—Northern profitability depends on maintaining 90% rates as new complexes mature
  4. Customer willingness to pay for premium amenities (medical facility) is proven in North and represents untapped opportunity in South
  5. First-mover advantage in fragmented Northern market justifies startup risks and capital allocation away from Southern expansion