This is an intentional "red herring" case designed to test candidate resilience, creativity under constraint, and willingness to deliver bad news. Every path forward systematically fails—legal action is expensive and unfeasible, direct appeals are stonewalled, media pressure backfires on the clients, alternative pressure mechanisms (strikes, petitions, alumni support) all prove ineffective. The core evaluation criterion is whether the candidate maintains enthusiasm and structured thinking as each avenue closes, rather than finding a magical solution.
COVID has fundamentally changed the MBA experience for students. Classes are mostly remote, travel has been eliminated, and the students are not happy. However, Columbia Business School (CBS) is still charging the same tuition as before COVID. Our client is a group of CBS students who feel that they are not getting the full value of their MBA.
In the view of our clients, the MBA is as much about the relationships built with classmates and the experiences gained as it is about the education. Some of our client’s were even placed on probation by the school for traveling. They are extremely unhappy. How do we approach pressuring the school into giving our clients a tuition reduction?