Recommendation: Candidate can recommend assigning Anson to either made-to-measure or bespoke line depending on rationale and provide a salary cap of either $3,500 or $4,500.
Reason: Delay was caused by made-to-measure orders exceeding the shop’s capacity; hiring Anson will increase the capacity at bottleneck processes (finishing and patterning & sewing, respectively)
Risks: There is a tradeoff between profit and customer satisfaction involved in assigning Anson to either made-to-measure or bespoke line. Given Nutters’ brand equity, a longer delay in the form of a waitlist may actually increase the brand’s exclusivity; on the other hand, the client’s original concern was customer satisfaction, and an additional revenue of $1,000 per month ($4,500 - $3,500) is likely insignificant for Nutters.
Next Steps: A strong candidate should suggest other ways for Nutters to alleviate the delay problem. For instance, if FTEs can be moved between steps, and assuming FTEs are not limited by skill, then spare capacity at the “measuring” step can be used to increase capacity elsewhere. Additionally, if resource can be pooled between the made-to-order and bespoke lines, then Nutters can avoid having spare capacity in the bespoke line while the made-to-measure line struggles to fulfill demand.