Suggested framework: Revenue, Costs, Capability, Risks
- Revenue:
- What percentage of current income is generated from commercial activities? What is a realistic future target?
- How is current commercial activity income further broken down, and which activities have potential for revenue growth? (i.e. items grouped under commercial activities could include ticket sales, cafes & restaurants, in-gallery shop retail, publishing, venue hire, commercial filming venue provision, etc)
- Is National Gallery charging visitors for permanent collection or special exhibitions only?
- How price sensitive are museum visitors to tickets and other purchases?
- Could the National Museum further grow its donations and corporate sponsorships?
- Costs:
- What percentage of costs relate to commercial activities (as opposed to costs relating to fulfilling its public mission)?
- How are costs relating to commercial activities broken down (i.e. cost breakdowns could include special exhibition curation, permanent collection maintenance, marketing, labour, costs from shops, cafes & restaurants, etc)?
- Are there inefficiencies in costs structures that could be tackled to improve profitability?
- Capabilities:
- Funding: will the National Gallery have sufficient funds for suggested solutions?
- Stakeholder buy-ins: will solutions receive support from key stakeholders (including the government, current corporate sponsors, board members, and key partners)?
- Skillsets: will the National Gallery’s current staff have sufficient capability to implement solutions (or capability to secure external expertise for implementation)?
- Risks:
- Are the profitability-oriented solutions coherent with the National Gallery’s brand image and public mission?
- Are solutions only addressing short term profitability? Or are they long-term sustainable?
- What are the implementation and reputation risks associated with suggested solutions?