Colombian Hippos
Practice this intermediate strategic decision case interview question from McKinsey in the Non-profit sector. Includes detailed problem prompt, clarifying questions, structured framework, and expert recommendation. Part of ProHub's 835+ consulting case library.
This interviewer-led case tests qualitative reasoning and financial analysis in a non-traditional setting. The candidate must evaluate two mutually exclusive options with incomplete information, requiring assumptions about tourist demand and capacity constraints. The case emphasizes that government decisions involve trade-offs beyond pure profitability.
Clarifying Information
- A strong candidate will want to assess the scope of the damage, the stakeholders affected, and potential solutions/risks.
- The government has a deep budget to address the hippo problem. However, the client would still be interested in solutions that are cost-neutral / revenue-generating.
- Hippos are dangerous animals who have been known to attack humans. An average hippo eats 88 pounds of vegetation per day and will eat both wild plants and human-grown crops.
- Only hippos are in-scope for this case. Disregard other animals.
- The rate of hippo population growth is not an important assumption and will not factor into the case.
Practice More Case Interview Questions
Browse 835+ real consulting case interview examples from top firms. Filter by difficulty, company, industry, or case type. Or try our AI mock interview for instant feedback and scoring.