Is Teleconferencing a Good Call?
Practice this advanced it case interview question in the Financial Services sector. Includes detailed problem prompt, clarifying questions, structured framework, and expert recommendation. Part of ProHub's 835+ consulting case library.
This is a structured cost-benefit analysis case that requires candidates to quantify travel expense savings against implementation costs for two competing solutions (outside vendor vs. build in-house). The case tests ability to conduct financial modeling, identify that both options have similar payback periods (~2-3 months), and recognize that qualitative factors (client relationships, cybersecurity, compliance, maintainability) are the true decision drivers.
Clarifying Information
- Time Frame: As soon as possible
- Purpose: Assess whether or not Teleconferencing should be used by Wealth Advisors in lieu of traveling to meet new/current clients at satellite offices
- Geography: US Only. All Advisors are located in NYC, Houston, Chicago, and San Francisco. Satellite offices are scattered throughout the Midwest and southern United States, which require extensive, frequent travel to meet current and prospective clients
- Current State: Primarily via in-person meetings. Occasionally phone and email. There is no virtual conferencing in use, with the exception of the test pilot (which was implemented 6 months ago)
- Technology: The virtual conferencing allows for instant messaging, video chatting, screen share/share control, conference calling, and call forwarding to a mobile phone
- Goal: The goal is to reduce costs; revenue growth is not in scope
- Competitors: Unknown
Practice More Case Interview Questions
Browse 835+ real consulting case interview examples from top firms. Filter by difficulty, company, industry, or case type. Or try our AI mock interview for instant feedback and scoring.