STRUCTURE GUIDANCE
The case is intended to evaluate the creative thinking of the candidate.
A great structure will be one the provides out-of-the-box ideas of the implications of launching the flexible loan product (e.g.: in revenues, monetizing usage data in other ways, such as predictive maintenance)
Suggested next course of action: evaluate the economic benefits of the flexible loan.
SAMPLE STRUCTURE
Main structure:
Attractiveness of the new flexible loan product
├── Strategic fit
│ ├── Product
│ ├── Clients
│ └── Competitors
├── Economic benefits
│ ├── Revenues
│ ├── Costs
├── Capabilities
│ ├── IT / technical
│ └── Operational
└── Risks
├── Loan re-payment
├── Data confidentiality
└── Fraud
Possible brainstorm ideas:
- What of our clients’ problems would we be solving?
E.g.: payment flexibility in times of low liquidity
- What industries could be interested?
E.g.: Seasonal businesses
- Are competitors providing this kind of solutions?
Can we make it a competitive advantage?
- Can we charge a higher interest rate?
- SaaS (software as a service) fees?
- Alternative ways to monetize data?
- Fixed: technical team, platform infrastructure
- Variable: IoT devices, platform scaling
- What technical team and skills would we need?
- How would we install the IoT devices?
- How will the data be shared among stakeholders?
- Are the flexible loan terms and conditions different than those of a standard loan?
- What if the client doesn’t use the machine as planned?
- Would clients be willing to share their production data?
- What kind of usage data will be used?
- How can we guarantee the usage data is trustful?
- How can we cover from customer tampering the IoT?