Investment Bank Spin-off

ProHub Comment

This case blends quantitative financial analysis with qualitative strategic considerations. Candidates must calculate revenue changes (driven by market share expansion post-spinoff) and cost impacts (driven by loss of shared services), then contextualize the financial benefit of USD 4.15M against organizational, cultural, and competitive factors.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Hard
Source IESE
50 / 100

Your client is a leading retail bank in a South American country, with over 3,000 branches across the country. In addition to the retail business, the bank also has an Investment Banking (IB) unit, which acts as an intermediary and/or advisor when corporations want to engage in complex financial transactions (for example M&A, raising capital, initial public offering (IPO), etc.).

The IB unit of this bank is headed by a Vice President who reports to the bank’s CEO.

This IB VP hired you to evaluate whether the IB should spin off from the retail bank, becoming fully independent from the conglomerate.

Clarifying Information

  1. The main reason behind the VP’s request is financial – i.e. end goal is additional profits for the IB
  2. IBs operate on a fee-based model. They are remunerated as a percentage of the total transaction in which they facilitated for the company (e.g. 2% fee of a USD 100M transaction means USD 2M in revenues for the IB)
  3. She suspects that even though being attached to the retail bank provides benefits (e.g. shared systems and services, access to clients), the IB unit is unable to tap additional sources of revenues (e.g. through Joint Ventures with other Investment Banks)
  4. She is also worried about the bureaucracy imposed by the conglomerate, which slows down relevant (and sometimes urgent) decisions for the IB unit
  5. For simplicity, you can assume that there is no discount rate, time value of money and required NPV calculations for the case
  6. Considerations regarding the momentum of the Investment Banking industry are not relevant for this case