MIC, a dominant milk producer, must reduce GHG emissions by 45% within 5 years or face shutdown. With a $750m/year budget, candidates must identify the most cost-effective emission reduction levers across farming, processing, and transportation operations. The core challenge is optimal resource allocation across multiple initiatives to achieve the regulatory target.
Key Insights:
- Emissions analysis reveals farming (particularly cows at 63% of total emissions) is the primary driver—80/20 principle suggests focusing here first
- Herd replacement with lower-emission breed offers significant impact (21% reduction) but represents largest capital commitment ($2.5B over 5 years)
- Portfolio approach required: combining herd replacement (21%), renewable energy in processing (70% reduction potential), and fleet electrification (100% reduction potential) achieves ~90% of target
- Budget constraint ($750m/year or $3.75B total) requires prioritization—candidates must justify which initiatives to pursue and sequence
- Implementation risks include farmer adoption, supply chain disruption, technology viability, and regulatory/political risk that should be addressed