GasCo Goes the Distance

ProHub Comment

This case tests both quantitative analysis and strategic reasoning. Candidates must calculate transportation costs and profitability across two regions while balancing hard numbers against qualitative factors like existing customer relationships and market dynamics. The core tension—higher costs but existing customers in APAC versus lower costs and higher prices in EMEA—forces candidates to articulate a clear value proposition for their recommendation.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Medium
Source ROSS
50 / 100

Your client is GasCo, a US-based natural gas company. In the last year, natural gas prices in the US have declined while prices in APAC and EMEA have increased. GasCo currently has managed to develop a new way to transport gas. The new technology significantly lowers the cost of transportation. Due to the new technology, GasCo would like to expand in the global market. GasCo would like to know if they should enter the APAC, EMEA, or both regions?

APAC - Asia Pacific & China

EMEA - Europe, Middle East, and Africa

Clarifying Information

  1. GasCo’s new technology is unique to their company and no other competitors have this technology. The new technology significantly lowers the cost to transport gas. Gas normally has to be shipped in large containers, but now the gas is able to be liquified and then transported, significantly reducing cost of transportation.
  2. GasCo’s main concern is overall profitability when entering the market.
  3. GasCo is worried about 1) whether there will be demand in the region and 2) which market is more profitable
  4. GasCo has 2 major customers: 1 in China and 1 in Japan