Fruit Drink Co.

ProHub Comment

This is a well-structured profitability case focused on competitive cost disadvantage analysis. The case uses concrete data (Exhibit A showing per-unit cost breakdowns) to guide candidates toward identifying three key cost drivers: pomegranate procurement, packaging materials, and sales/marketing spend. The brainstorming section effectively tests how candidates generate hypotheses and respond to client pushback on implementation constraints.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Easy
Source Wharton
50 / 100
We have been hired by a large CPG client. One of their product lines is a pomegranate drink. They have observed that they are losing market share to the competition as well as their profitability is lower compared to the competition. We have been asked to help them turn around the situation.

Clarifying Information

  1. Objective - Objective is to understand why the market share and profitability is lower compared to competition and how we can turn-around the situation.
  2. Business - The client is manufacturer of the drink and uses third party retailers and distributors.
  3. Geography - The client is a US-based client and has sales all over US region.
  4. Competition - Our market share is 20% vs. 36% for our competitor. Our profit margin is -8% compared to 10% for our competitor. Profits have been in the red for the last two years. There are other players in the market but we do not have much data for them.