Drinks Gone Flat

ProHub Comment

This is a classic revenue decomposition case testing candidates' ability to break down a business problem using price-quantity analysis and identify root causes through data segmentation. The case rewards structured thinking, efficient use of exhibits, and the ability to move from diagnosis to actionable recommendations without excessive interviewer prompting. The Value Brand's aggressive price reduction (from $0.60 to $0.40) is driving volume cannibalization while eroding overall profitability.

Estimated Time 16 minutes
Difficulty Easy
Source NYU
26 / 100
The beverage department of a regional supermarket has seen a drop in revenue over the last year and has hired your firm to determine the cause of the decline and recommend ways to reverse the trend.

Clarifying Information

  1. Client is a leading regional grocer within the southeastern U.S.
  2. Competitive landscape has not changed in the last year
  3. Revenue decline is specifically within the beverage segment
  4. Client wants to find the cause of the declining revenue and recommendations for how to stop the decline
Mock Interview
Interviewer

The beverage department of a regional supermarket has seen a drop in revenue over the last year and has hired your firm to determine the cause of the decline and recommend ways to reverse the trend.

You

Thanks. Before analyzing, I'd like to clarify a few key questions...

Interviewer

Good question. Let me provide some background information...

You

Based on this, I suggest analyzing from these dimensions...

AI Score
Structure Analysis Communication Business Sense Quantitative
Practicing...
Score coming soon
Practice this case with AI Mock Interview

A regional supermarket’s beverage department experienced declining revenue year-over-year. Through analysis of product category and brand-level data, the root cause is identified as the Value Brand’s price reduction, which increased its volume share from 25MM to 60MM gallons while generating lower revenue ($15M to $24M) due to the 33% price cut, thereby cannibalizing premium brands (particularly Brand A) and creating overall revenue decline of $6M in sodas.

Key Insights:

  1. Revenue = Price × Quantity; candidates must decompose declines across both dimensions to isolate root causes
  2. Pricing power is often the critical lever; the Value Brand’s aggressive discounting ($0.60→$0.40) is more impactful than volume gains
  3. Data segmentation is essential; category-level analysis reveals sodas declining while waters/others grow; brand-level analysis reveals Brand A decline masks Value Brand cannibalization
  4. Candidates should use structured frameworks (4Ps, pricing strategies, marketing differentiation) when brainstorming solutions
  5. Time management is tested; good candidates move efficiently through exhibits without dwelling on data that doesn’t explain the decline