Warehouse Co.

ProHub Comment

This case tests the candidate's ability to filter extraneous information and focus on quantifiable cost impacts. The key is recognizing that labor savings drive the entire financial case, while most other operational costs are relatively immaterial. The payback period of 3.33 years is reasonable but not exceptional, making the recommendation contingent on risk tolerance and strategic considerations.

Estimated Time 15 minutes
Difficulty Medium
Source Bauer
50 / 100
Your client is Warehouse Co., a company that sells warehousing services to other companies for shipping or inventory purposes. The COO loves new technology and regularly attends startup conferences. At the last conference, a start-up supported by Y Combinator with multiple Venture Capital backers stood out to the COO. The startup was founded by a long-time entrepreneur with a very successful past. It’s already been awarded multiple industry awards and the CEO of the startup is even hinting at an IPO. The technology is a crane powered by AI developed with the help of Microsoft consultants that automatically detects and moves shipping containers. It’s taken about a decade to develop and has only been publicly sold for a few years now. The COO wants your help in determining if they should implement the crane or not.

Clarifying Information

  1. Warehouse Co. does not have a specific payback period in mind
  2. The technology has been used by some competitors with varying degrees of success
  3. Costs to automate are 1) $6M Initial Investment 2) $1M/Year Maintenance