Framework Guidance:
Note: There are many possible alternatives to this framework. These are only provided as possible suggestions.
Direct Costs
- Wages and Benefits
- Recruiting (ex. applicant tracking system)
- Training/education
- Retention/enrichment
- Turnover/severance packages
- Overhead and HR team capacity
Indirect Costs
- Opportunity cost (underperformance of hired staff)
- Loss of knowledge with turnover
- Decline in morale with turnover or poor management
External Factors
- Economic Cycle
- Competition
- Labor Force (supply vs. demand)
- Education patterns?
- Union?
A good candidate will focus on costs and will not build in revenue considerations into their framework.
A great candidate will build incorporate differences between salary/hourly employees or even differences among the four types of staff (from the clarifying questions). Another framework option below. Candidate could fill in the table as case unfolds.
People Cost Considerations
Direct:
Department Size | Artistic: Medium | Executive: Small | Administrative: Medium | Security: Big
Wages and Benefits | $ | $$ | $ | $
Training/education | High | High | Medium | Low
Turnover/retention | | | |
Severance | Low | High | Low | N/A
Indirect:
- Opportunity cost (hours sunk)
- Loss of knowledge
- Decline in morale
External Factors
- Economic Cycle
- Competition
- Labor Force
How to Move Forward:
To move forward, the candidate should call out different types of staff the client must hire for The Met. Ideally, the candidate points to turnover costs or cost of hiring as a potential lever to investigate further. Provide Exhibit 1 and let candidate respond to the table.