A Senate Judiciary Committee chair seeks consulting advice on drafting and passing a “Ban the Box” bill that removes criminal history questions from job applications to improve employment opportunities for formerly incarcerated persons. The case requires analyzing stakeholder factors, quantifying recidivism reduction benefits, and building bipartisan support.
Key Insights:
- Structured frameworks matter more than easy math—when quantitative analysis is straightforward, the critical differentiator is the ‘so what’ and policy implications
- Political feasibility requires identifying both economic and social benefits to diverse constituencies; 180k FIPs avoiding recidivism demonstrates measurable impact for budget-conscious and justice-minded senators
- Consultant neutrality is essential in sensitive contexts, but genuine passion for the issue can enhance creative recommendations if channeled professionally
- Expanding scope (to college admissions) can unlock additional legislative support while amplifying impact through education’s multiplier effect on opportunity and recidivism reduction