Tiny Ripples Coffee Co. faces declining profitability despite revenue growth. Candidates must analyze financial statements, identify that COGS is the primary driver (9.5 percentage points above industry average), brainstorm solutions, and recommend a strategy constrained by a $250K investment cap and brand considerations. The best approach combines operational efficiency improvements with supplier negotiations.
Key Insights:
- COGS analysis reveals the bottleneck: client pays 27.5% vs. industry 18% due to premium sustainable sourcing and operational inefficiencies
- SG&A is actually efficient (42.5% vs. industry 45%), indicating room to invest in marketing rather than cutting costs
- Solution must balance financial improvement ($640K profit target) with mission preservation—rejecting options that damage brand positioning
- Sequencing matters: prioritize operational fixes (high-efficiency roasters) before renegotiating supplier contracts to strengthen negotiating position
- Candidate quality differentiator: recognizing that tax rates cannot be easily changed and that slight pricing premium aligns with brand value proposition