The Grass is Greener
Practice this intermediate growth strategy case interview question from Bain in the Agriculture sector. Includes detailed problem prompt, clarifying questions, structured framework, and expert recommendation. Part of ProHub's 835+ consulting case library.
ProHub Comment
This case requires candidates to synthesize quantitative emissions data with qualitative adoption barriers to recommend a targeted strategy. The key difficulty lies in identifying which practices offer the best tradeoff between environmental impact, financial viability, and farmer adoption likelihood—a realistic constraint often overlooked in pure impact scenarios.
Estimated Time
27 minutes
Difficulty
Medium
Source
Duke
36
/ 100
The nonprofit GreenHarvest Alliance (GHA) aims to accelerate the adoption of regenerative agriculture (we’ll call it regen for short) practices in the U.S. Regen practices (e.g., cover cropping, reduced tillage, crop rotation) improve soil health, reduce emissions, and increase resilience to climate change. Despite clear environmental benefits, only ~10% of U.S. farmland currently uses regenerative practices. GHA’s Executive Director has hired Bain to strategize how to increase the number of farmers adopting regenerative agriculture practices.
Clarifying Information
- Definition: Regen ≠ Organic. Organic is a USDA certification with strict rules; regen is broader and focuses on outcomes (soil health, biodiversity). Certification for regen is still evolving and not standardized.
- Objective: GHA does not have specific numeric targets for soil carbon or biodiversity. The focus is on increasing farmer adoption and understanding what works.
- Geography: U.S. focused. Global regen examples exist, but for this case, assume U.S. farmers, markets, and policy.